The universal write-in candidate -
for every secret-ballot election on the planet!
The face of Johnny Cheese.
Welcome to the Blog of the Universal Secret-ballot Write-in Candidate!
Select a 'Vote Johnny Cheese' banner for your site
and promote the
end of the era of secret-ballot voting and all the tragic
and silly drama that it entails!
David Icke on the Travesty of One-party, One-kabal, No-contract -based Politics
This speach by David Icke is 31m09s long. It is worth listening to -- it in its entirety, more than once.
Jump to the 12m marker if you are pressed for time. If you are really pressed for time, then listen for
as long as you can past the 12m mark... then, jump to the last 1.5 minutes of the clip.
1. (paraphrasing) "...[the people, when coming together to redress grievances and to form a more perfect
union,]... need to [seriously consider viewing 'politcs' -- in its current defacto form -- which is the
form known as "no contract -based elected officials", as a form of 'politics" that is
morally and ethically repugnant to the general welfare of the people, and, should take measures to institute
elected officials that are explicitly bound by contract]."
1.1 (paraphrasing) "[otherwise, if there is no contract then there is no guarantee
that they are representing you.]" (Ed. Note: No business person would do that. Why should it be different
with "politics"?)
2. "...realize that politics... in its present form, will never be the answer to what is going on... we have to do it...
we the people have to do it... because [nearly all elected] politicians [on the planet] are here to do the
very opposite of what's good for people."
Alessio Rastani Addressing Bank of Ideas / Occupy London
Here is a video of trader and patriot-citizen Alessio Rastani making a speach to a group of fellow patriot-citizens
during the "Bank of Ideas / Occupy London" gathering which took place recently on the land-mass called London.
"Who runs the world?"
"Goldman Sachs runs the world."
Listen closely to what Alessio has to say. He will make you think twice about casting a secret-ballot vote
for a corporate-based candidate.
###
~ Posted by Michael - the lazy J.C. Party hack. Link
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2005
I tell them not to vote.
"I am influenced enough by [Emma Goldman, Thoreau, Mark Twain, Whitman,
Salinger, and Mailer], and by [Henry] Miller to tell my students,
the poets at least, to cultivate an ignorance of contemporary
politics and military events because they do not matter. I tell
them not to vote, to join nothing. I try to steer them toward
their true leaders and visionaries, men [and women] almost
unknown in the polite literary world..."
~ Karl Shapiro
on Henry Miller in the essay entitled 'The Greatest Living Author.'
A first-grade teacher, agent Abigail, at Concentration Campus
for Mind Destruction #107 on the landmass called Park Slope, Brooklyn,
said she hadn't heard about the day and was surprised that it
was going to be sprung on agent-teachers with so little notice.
"I do not like how the agents above me are just slipping
this in and saying, 'Were giving you US Federal Reserve Note fiat currency units expropriated from taxpayers,
so you have to do this,'"
agent Abigail said. "Maybe some teachers need a refresher
course on the 'teachings' of Lysander Spooner. They might
need some professional development and an opportunity to
brainstorm some idea first."
Cognizant of the fact that this Constitution dies when we, the undersigned, die, so let said Constitiution be
hereby ratified in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the
Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and
Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth.
...for "Mayor of New York City," provided that if Johnny Cheese is "elected," that he
then does not
"report for duty."
"..the struggle of the human being to emancipate himself, that is, to liberate
himself from the prison of his own making, that is for the supreme subject.
That is why I am powerfully drawn to the men of wisdom, the men who have
experienced life to the full and who give life- artists, religious figures,
pathfinders, innovators and iconoclasts of all sorts. And perhaps- why not
say it? - that is why I have so little appreciation of the transitory
revolutionaries. For me the only true revolutionaries are the inspirers and
the activators, figures like Jesus, Lao-Tse, Guatama the Buddha, Akhnaton,
Ramakrishna, Krishnamurti,
Frederick Mann,
Jon Rappoport,
Johnny Cheese.
The yardstick I employ is life:
how men stand in relation to life. Not whether they succeeded in overthrowing
a government, a social order, a religious form, a moral code, a system of
education, an economic tyranny. Rather, how did they affect life itself?
For what distinguishes the men I have in mind is that they did not impose
their authority on man; on the contrary, they sought to destroy authority.
Their aim and purpose was to open up life, to make man hungry for life,
to exalt life- and to refer all questions back to life. They exhorted man
to realize that he had all freedom in himself, that he was not to concern
himself with the fate of the world (which is not his problem) but to solve
his own individual problem, which is a question of liberations, nothing else."
"I apologize for casting a secret-ballot vote for John Kerry
and for thinking stictly within the context of 'I must cast secret-ballot vote. I must cast for John, not for
George'. I am ashamed." he said.
Furthermore he added, "I apologize for telling taxpayers that listen to me to cast a secret-ballot
vote for John Kerry
and for strictly setting up the context of the utterance as 'You must cast secret-ballot vote. You must cast for John, not for
George'. I am ashamed."
It was not clear to me from the context of the apology whether or not Mike
is now ready to consider that the concept called "secret-ballot voting"
is a bogus concept.
I and the J.C. party hacks sincerely appreciate your apology, Mike.
Keep up the great work! Especially luv your 'mr. rogers -like story time segment'.
###
~ Posted by Johnny himself - the universal secret-ballot
write-in candidate. Link
...for every secret-ballot election on the planet.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: NOVEMBER 3, 2004
The Lazy J.C. Hack.
Hi, I'm Michael. I'm the new J.C. hack. My role is to be the lazy J.C. hack.
Here are some search strings as seen in the JC logs over the past 30 days:
what happens to public who do not vote in general election
if i didn't register can i still vote for president
can i write-in joseph lieberman in new york
kids voting for president
can i vote for a write-in candidate
can you write in a vote for anyone
what states did george bush visit during his campaigne
article of u.s president campaigne
how to write in voting president 2004
can i write in my vote in national election
middleman wealth candidate vote
what percentage of the presidential vote is for write-in mickey mouse
###
~ Posted by Michael - the lazy J.C. Party hack. Link
what happens to public who do not vote in general election
...the Vote Johnny Cheese website shows up with a rank of 50.
So the answer to the question is... it frees up ones time to focus on discovering and nuturing ones own vision
and it frees up ones time to only assign "zero- to -positive-infinity values" to the various situations
and facts that one interacts with
on a daily basis.
The hallucination, in ones mind, that is called "secret-ballot voting" evaporates when exercising the mind
in accordance with the two techniques above.
The side effects? Feelings of Euphoria!
(i.e. feelings of "no-guilt-what-so-ever").
Like not smoking, elliminating the hallucination in your mind that is called "secret-ballot voting"
will probably extend your life.
So, will I be "casting any secret-ballot votes" now or in the future? I think you know the answer.
How does this post make you feel? What are some ways you could learn to use this new discovery
to raise your awareness of your strengths? Were there any special surprises in this for you? Did it
raise any new questions for you?
This film is a must see. Hats off
to Shirley Chisholm and to Shola Lynch for bringing
Shirley Chisholm's story to the silver screen. Shirley and Shola have charisma.
On January 25, 1972, after two terms in Congress, Chisholm announced her
"candidacy for president".
She boldly stood at the podium and said, "I stand before you
today as a candidate for the Democratic nomination for the Presidency of the United States
of America. I am not the candidate of the black US taxpayers, although I am a black US taxpayer
and proud. I am not the candidate of the women US taxpayers, although I am a woman US taxpayer, and I am
equally proud of that. I am not the candidate of any US agent bosses or special US taxpayers. I am
the candidate of the US taxpayers."
If "secret-ballot voting" did not have to pass the "intuition test", then logically, I would "cast
a secret-ballot vote" for Shirley Chisholm. But, logic alone (i.e. without the guiding hand of the "intuition")
is unable to
correctly process reality.
In the final scene of the film, listen closely to what Shirly Chisholm has to say.
Over 100,000,000 US taxpayers - 'deemed elligible to cast secret-ballot votes', made a 'huge impact' on
the 'last US Presidential secret-ballot election'. They choose to
not 'cast a secret-ballot vote'.
The 2 taking points of my candidacy are posed as questions:
1. Is the act of not voting an act of being responsible? If no, then why?, If yes, then why?
2. Putting aside voting, what
other systems are out there,
or what other systems need to
be created, that can collectively uplift the economic status of tens of millions
of people faster than any politician could ever hope for or dream of?
"In these times, when, everyday, more and more citizens are making the responsible
decision to not vote in the upcoming General Election, they come to rely on
confederations such as the Better-World Project
to fill 'the void in their minds' that
such a decision disturbingly creates. The Better-World Project provides an empowering
framework to explore how we can collectively achieve practical abundance and prosperity
in our lifetimes without having to necessarily rely on pre-existing systems such as
secret-ballot voting!" ~ Johnny Cheese, the Universal Write-in
Candidate for Every Secret-Ballot Election on the Planet.
Responsible taxpayers actively take full responsiblity for creating their lives, their communities
and the world around them.
...for far too many of us, secret-ballot voting is a way to escape
responsibility. Too often we feel that because we cast secret-ballot votes and pay our taxes, we have done
our part. What have we really done?
By casting secret-ballot votes, have we created any real value? Or have we simply gotten ourselves off the hook
from our responsibility to create real value for ourselves?
We engage in lively debates with friends, we donate money to
political hacks and maybe
we even take action to influence
secret-ballot voting schemes. Meanwhile, we could have been taking
action to create real value in our lives and communities.
Rather than getting all whirled up in a political frenzy, watching the latest
political news as if it were a sporting event, we could have been "on
the field,"
playing--creating,
making a difference!
Rather than lobbying for a new tax law that gives us a personal advantage
of one sort or another, we could have been building businesses or organizations
which create wealth, jobs and opportunities.
Rather than complaining about a politacl hack's health care policies, we could
have been at the gym working out and building our health.
Rather than listening to the debates, we could have been creating inspiring art, teaching
values to our youth or educating others in a way that empowers them to be creators.
Is there anything wrong with secret-ballot voting?
...for most of us, the whole political
process - within the context of secret-ballot voting - and all the time we spend engaged in it, tends to take the focus
off ourselves
as creators.
Instead, we are focused on what some agent-hack of the taxpayers
official is going to do for us.
By casting secret-ballot vote, we are reinforcing a system that destroys more values than it
creates, a system based on compromise, rather than creation (more on this
in a future blog [post] [to be posted here]).
We have reinforced a system designed to promote IRRESPONSIBILITY. That's right,
the system we live in promotes irresponsibility. How?
Our system encourages us to look to agents of taxpayers, to others outside of ourselves,
for the answers to our problems. And what it means to be responsible in our present
system is to follow the system. In other words, it is "responsible" to follow
and obey the answers of agents outside of ourselves, because they are the
system controllers--they were "elected" by those who casted secret-ballot votes.
Responsibility, in my eyes, means I am the creator of my life, I am the solver
of my problems--not some agent outside of myself. The more
we believe that "responsible" means obedience to the whim of the agents and to those who cast secret-ballot votes,
the more irresponsible we become.
From an early age, most of us in today's world were taught obedience as a
higher value than integrity. Obedience is following someone else and his/her
values. Integrity is following one's own mind, conscience and values.
Should you cast a secret-ballot vote? No. Not unless the 'candidate' in question
provides you with a written
political-hack guarantee.
And as you find yourself getting wrapped up in
all the election drama and the whole game of who's right and who's wrong,
and who will lead us best...
Remember this...
Like Neo in The Matrix, YOU are THE One. You are the Creator of your life.
Real change will come, not from the agents of taxpayers, but from individuals who
assume full responsibility for creating their lives, their future,
their world. Vote for yourself as a Creator.
Responsible taxpayers, create first. casting secret-ballot votes and participating in the
election game in a system that promotes irresponsibility is something
that truly responsible taxpayers often make little time for.
What is 'Responsible Voting'?
I would suggest that rather than voting for 'what can this
political hack can do for me', vote for 'what freedom and properity can I create for myself
and the world'*.
[*Ed. Note:Help is on the way! Actually, it is already here. Visit the
Better-World Project to learn more!]
We are approaching the dawn of a new age... the Age of Creation, where
human beings (allow me, for a moment, to remove the 'taxpayer' label) recognize
their natural power to create for themselves,
where we as individuals take complete responsibility for our lives.
###
~ Posted by Johnny himself - the universal secret-ballot
write-in candidate. Link
...for every secret-ballot election on the planet.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: July 18, 2004
Clothing Of The American Taxpayer Mind.
Though company founder Caitlin Blue and business partner Valerie Dillman
advocate US taxpayers to cast secret-ballot votes,
nevertheless, I endorse their
highly creative fashion designs!
Believe that secret-ballot voting is not an effective way of preserving our freedom,
security or prosperity;
Believe that the first step towards a free and peaceful society is to withdraw our support
from a system that is destructive of freedom and peace;
Or are simply at your wits' end because you are being
asked - by certain indivuals - to "choose" between two agents of the
same secret society -
as if you will be empowered by the experience of choosing between one of the two - ...
...then express your indignation with an anti-secret-ballot voting t-shirt!
"If you do not consider yourself a slave, then there is no need for you to shop for a
master, now is there."
Johnny whispered into my ear the other day -
as we were leaving the Sixy Six -
that there must exist a certain "short-circuit" in everyone's brain that can be flipped-on.
(He's betting everything
on this hypothesis).
And once that switch gets flipped-on in your head, you will never consider the concept of "secret
ballot voting" to be a valid concept ever again... while at the same time feeling guilt free
and
creatively liberated.
Then Johnny said to me, "Ya know, I really like that
Will Markson. He has the potential
to 're-direct' that creative energy of his."
Jeff Vogel - Presidential Candidate of the Scorched Earth Party.
via the always reliable Metafilter in
which Johnny Cheese also
gets plugged.
We were the first political party
to advocate renaming the Washington Monument the Big Stone U.S. Penis and
putting big, orange foam testicles at the bottom.
I can never seem to put my finger on it, but there are some exact
cosmic mixes(more
than one point in math-space-time - for each individual) of
brain-space, time, repetition,
slave-speak,
and free-speak, that will
unlock
and free the guilt associated
with not taking action. That is to say, not having any desire to
cast a secret-ballot vote but rather, having only the desire to live one's life.
The following is definitely one piece,
when taken within the context of other pieces, will form one or more points
of the cosmic-secret-mix that snaps together the synapsi of the brain to
the guilt-free orgasmic sensation of not taking action - that is to say of taking one to the concept
of regarding the concept of secret-ballot voting as invalid:
Will the winner of AMERICAN CANDIDATE definitely run for president?
"What the participants decide to do with the visibility and momentum they will have
at the conclusion of the series is entirely up to them. If a participant in
AMERICAN CANDIDATE
chooses to run for president, he or she will have to follow
the same process and operate within the same laws and regulations that govern
all presidential candidates. We anticipate that if a participant does run, he
or she would be doing so on a
write-in basis.
Of course, with the publicity and attention the candidate will have received,
it is feasible there could be a substantial amount of taxpayer support for him/her."
First off, if you consider yourself a US Taxpayer, then reading this portal on
"outsourcing" and this portal on
"secret-ballot voting" - both
written by Indian taxpayers and published from the landmass called India - should get your adrenalin
pumping.
And not casting a secret-ballot vote is as self-empowering as, say, back-in-the-day, discovering that the planet is
round and not the center of the universe.
We found out about it via Linda Thieman of Blog for Iowa.
Though it would seem that Mr. Rcareaga of
slouching toward urschleim blog encourages
taxpayers to cast secret-ballot
votes (thereby helping to keep the tragic meme of secret-ballot voting and all the drama that it entails, alive),
we, the party hacks of Johnny Cheese, never-the-less luv his
deibold ad campaigne
and
his spirit.
With things getting so insanely funny these days, it certainly does help that the recent actions of Diebold
in the minds of skeptical taxpayers who read the Johnny Cheese Blog, actually then makes it easier
for those skeptical taxpayers to let go of their guilt and thereby instantly realize that
they have the power to make
guilt-free conscience decisions to stop casting secret-ballot votes.
Wow. Profound. You do not even need to make the actual
conscience decision to stop casting secret-ballot votes.
You just need to realize that you have the power
to make the conscience decision to stop casting secret-ballot votes.
Once you realize that, then the decision is defacto made for you,
and you feel guilt-free and sacrafice-free - the only mindset from which you can
best help others.
Now that's what we call empowerment!
There are many reasons why an individual chooses not to cast secret-ballot votes. All reasons are welcome!
Here are
Blow Hard's
(excerpts):
Tony Pierce: Which political party do you typically vote for?
Blow Hard's answer: Don't vote. And I don't buy that
whole "every vote counts" bullshit. Logically speaking, it only matters
if you cast the tie-breaker. But I did register once 12 years ago because a hot
girl at a cardtable asked me to my first year of college. Then I got a jury summons
a year later and said, "Fuck this."
Tony Pierce: List the last five presidents that you voted for.
Blow Hard: See above.
Tony Pierce: Who do you think you'll vote for president in the next election?
Eliminating Your Urge 'To Cast Secret-Ballot Votes'.
For thousands of years, human beings have searched for genuine freedom, peace and happiness.
Now, for the first time, a proven method has been devised to eliminate the
genetically-encoded instinctual passions of fear, aggression, nurture and
desire that are the root cause of human bondage, malice, sorrow, and the urge to cast secret-ballot votes.
Actual Freedom has nothing to do with the traditional spiritual path of
transcendence and avoidance - the promise of a mythical ‘freedom’ in an
imaginary life-after-death.
This new, non-spiritual method produces an actual freedom from our instinctual
animal passions, here and now, on earth, in this lifetime.
Actual Freedom offers a step by step, down-to-earth, practical progression
to becoming actually free of the Human Condition of malice, sorrow, and the urge to cast
secret-ballot votes - to be both happy
and harmless.
"Hard-fought campaign between two tough fecal alchemists (wanna-be agents);
some dirty tricks; vital issues at stake; polls show taxpayers are most worried about...;
debates between the wanna-be agents; huge monies spent; final secret-ballot vote-count tallied; taxpayers and agents must
rally behind 'winner'; not a perfect system, but it works; better than Saddam; if you didn't
cast a secret-ballot vote, you have no right to complain."
~snip~
"The FACT that Kerry and Bush are both Bonesman and will not discuss it is relegated to the
back burner as a curio, a little piece of titillation."
"I think the last time I cast a secret-ballot vote in a 'national election' was 1964. But especially
in a year when the two guys are Bonesmen, I wouldn't cast a secret-ballot vote if you paid me."
All in all, the taxpayer-audience was
"casting their secret-ballot votes"
for the
wanna-be agent who understood they were the taxpayer-audience
and understood what the taxpayer-audience had evolved into: an anticipatory intelligence that
knew the real joke before it was told, that wanted recognition for being at the center
of the Story, that realized the comedian/taxpayer-audience was the final reference and object
of every punch line.
~snip~
Unless and until the taxpayer-audience begins to grope, with its strange power, among itself for
ways of decentralizing political force on many fronts, the fascinating subliminal tennis
match will support a status quo as old and as outmoded as Father Knows Best, as the Pharaohs,
as Sumerian priesthoods, as rigid hunting pecking-order clans on the
wild plains.
~snip~
Most taxpayers are content to deal with the first few layers. But those layers are
buttressed by underlying whirls and swirls and smears and blots and dots and energy
vectors and taxpayer-interlocks that appear to have no starting point---there are
so many of them. It’s really magic.
Satan
is 'running' (so-called) and I like his slogan, "Cut out the middleman."
Parts of his "platform" (so-called) are even in line with mine. But, there is one major flaw
with the Devil's current approach: If he is "elected" (so-called), he fully intends
to show up to work. Not to mention that he has a "tax fetish".
I pity the Evil One.
###
~ Posted by Johnny himself - the universal secret-ballot
write-in candidate. Link
...for every secret-ballot election on the planet.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: FEBRUARY 12, 2004
Surrealism Marketed As 'Secret-ballot Vote For Johnny Cheese'.
...if you must 'cast a secret-ballot vote (so-called)'.
"There are very few 'comtemporary political spaces' where the energies of love and
imagination are understood and respected as powerful 'social forces'."
If one
who makes an excellent comment about
'surrealists' - in his book
Freedom Dreams -
can say it, then the secret-ballot vote monger that is Johnny Cheese
can co-opt it and brand it and make it his own - solely for the purposes of
duping you into 'casting a secret-ballot vote (so-called)'. grin ;-)
But 'seriously' grin ;-) though, if you do play the
game that is 'secret-ballot voting', then you should know (full disclosure) that
Johnnny Cheese is currently probably the only 'secret-ballot candidate' who
acknowledges the energies of love and
imagination.
"Just Make Sure You 'Cast' A 'Secret-ballot Vote'"?
What I find empowering about the mental contruct called "Johnny Cheese" over
nearly all other "secret-ballot" mental contructs (- the main exception being, e.g,
say, mental contructs around these "lines"... -)
is that, within the contextual universe that is the "Johhny Cheese" mental construct, there is,
by definition and by mental-intuitive-emotional feeling, no concept of
"guilt" and/or "admonishment" associated with NOT "casting a secret-ballot vote"
(so-called).
Is it this realization-fact that allows one to experience a "nivanana moment" precisely at that point in time when
one "let's oneself go" and "locks-in one's mind entirely "within" the "Johnny Cheese"
mental contruct?
The "nivanana moment" being (1) the self-realization that "secret-ballot" mental
contructs are not useful to ones well-being with respect to interacting with onesself and with other humans
and (2) the simultaneous self-realization that one has the ability to instantaneously and permenantly
"drop"/"erase" non-useful
contructs from ones mind and "move on with ones life".
"I have always had a real passion
for politics [within the contextual universe called
secret-ballot voting]. Most people look at politics [within the contextual universe called
secret-ballot voting] and see 'back-stabbing', 'mud-slinging', and 'smoked filled rooms' and say, "YUCK!"
I see 'back-stabbing', 'mud-slinging', and 'smoked filled rooms' and say 'That's Entertainment!!'"
Behold! the complete up-to-date
list of secret-ballot vote mongers!*
- currently minus Johnny Cheese and maybe
a few others. We'll ping D.C. and see if he is willing to add "Johnny Cheese" and "The Johnny Cheese
Party" to his list.
* - The page takes a few secs to load. This is a
frame site and it takes a few secs for the BIG list
to load within the frame.
"...on the whole
my advice to taxpayers dwelling
anywhere on planet earth is 'Don't believe anything an
agent says - because, he is in it for 'your' [sic] secret-ballot vote and for what he can get out of
the situation beginning the day after the secret-ballot voting shall have been decreed completed.'"
Has Johnny Cheese smashed the riddle by posing a riddle?
What happens if you 'cast' a
secret-ballot vote (so-called) for Johnny Cheese* - or, equivalently, what if you do not even bother
to schlep out to the location where the secret-ballot box sits to 'cast' the so-called secret-ballot vote
into the secret-ballot box?
Not sure, though, who - for you - you will want to have to televise your recounting of what will
have taken take place in your head (that "what will have taken place in your head"
you will be calling "revolution").
Whether or not cetain US agents will decree the November 2004 US secret-ballot election
"suspended", "posponed" or "on", remember, you can still "cast" secret-ballot votes for Johnny Cheese
in your head or with others at your own private Johnny Cheese party ceremonies - if you do not make
it to the "polls".
Happy secret-ballot voting!
###
~ Posted by Johnny himself - the universal secret-ballot
write-in candidate. Link
...for every secret-ballot election on the planet.
OK, they, Lance and Beth, "Libertarian" and "Green" respectively, (and other US taxpayers in the video clip
inside the clip),
are being vocal about their exposing, but, nevertheless, I am running the
above headline for this post 'cuz I like the sound of it.
Click here (Lance's site (be patient, it is kinda slow due to
the embedded
Real Player in the 9-19 post, I believe)), and scroll down
to the "September 19th" entry
and watch the 23 minute video. Like watching Canadian taxpayer TV. I luved it! Seriously, good stuff.
My daughter quipped that "US taxpayers
do not talk like that on TV." To which I retorted, "yes, it is rather sureal,
isn't it?"
Lance and Bruce are doing great exposing work. The next step is for them to embrace the power of
the dot.
###
~ Posted by Johnny himself - the universal secret-ballot
write-in candidate. Link
...for every secret-ballot election on the planet.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: SEPTEMBER 12, 2003
The Most Secret-ballot Votes Equals 'Mandate' To Coerce.
False. But more importantly, why do you consider 'secret-ballot voting'
a valid concept?
So... imagine, at this moment, that your inner child's
focus is inner focusing? What steps could you take to make yourself
'invisable!' in the eyes of a terrorcrat? This question stems from
the notion that terrorcrats
are inherently lazy - to the extent that - after an initial risk/benefit analysis - they only
coerce 'easy prey'.
Casting secret-ballot votes for Johnny Cheese - in every secret-ballot election taking place on the planet
now and in the
future - or, equally valid,not casting secret-ballots at all what-so-ever,
is on-par with experiencing,
first-hand,
the elegance and beauty of theoretical mathamatics. Nay... should I venture to say, on-par
with the feelings surrounding the realization that you just created a whole new
branch of theoretical mathematical space for you and your friends to play in - free-of-charge.
Nay... should I venture to say, on-par
with the feelings surrounding the excitement of playing pretend at the age of 6.
'Here, my gift to you'... sitting in the palm of your playmate... invisible to
the naked eye... that seed, sitting in her little palm... that seed that defines the complete
scope and infinite allowable
permutations of the universe-at-hand-to-be-at-that-moment-unleashed. That seed. That point. That dot.
If you were lectured to, in the past
- during your precious teen years, by one
of the more inspiring math Conditioners - while sitting in a confined chair-desk
on the landmass of your Concentration Campus For Mind Destruction - you may
have been able to hear the beautiful fleeting melody of the burning bird
in the gilded cage, when the Conditioner
digressed from conditioning and uttered "the dot has no size, no mass, and is infinitely small".
I felt my inner child's inner child when he said that. The elegance and power of the dot - builder
of numberlines to infinity and beyond.
Johnny Cheese is a figment of your imagination. Johnny Cheese is the the dot in the secret-ballot
universe. He has no size.
He has no mass. He is infinitely small. If he "wins", he can not coerce you - it's mathematically
impossible.
Getting back to the headline that started this post - inspired by
James Moore's post...
"Give me
a secret-ballot candidate who speaks his
inner child, and I'll show you a
secret-ballot candidate who's universe's set of infinite allowable permutations excludes coercion."
This article needs to so get over and go beyond
the "SHEEPLE" name calling, but I like this paragraph - even though I think it
too needs work:
"Suppose that there was a secret-ballot vote on the issue of whether or not theft
is ethical. If 51% of the people casting that day, cast secret-ballot votes that armed robbery was okay, does that make the
49% 'minority' wrong even though they cast secret-ballot votes saying that theft is unethical [not okay]? It may not seem
fair, and believe it or not, it isn't. In any instance of casting secret-ballot votes, however, the
validity of the issue is moot. No matter what the dispute is over, the "majority"
is always 'right', and the 'minority' is always 'wrong', even if the 'majority' voted
in favor of something which you found appalling."
If you feel compelled to "cast a secret-ballot vote", then "cast it" for me. I will not show up to work
with others to coerce you. That is because I am a figment of your imagination - by design.
The political views of certain "Latinos" are troubling for advocates for
limited coercion [not to
be confused with "advocates for no coercion"], who also tend to
be advocates for less coercive "border crossing" policies. As the New York Times reported yesterday, and has
been well-known for some time by those who follow such things, certain "Latinos", like prior waves of
poor humans from landmasses where the influence of Catholic priests is high, tend to favor
coercive economic policies. In the famous Nolan Chart,
certain "Latino" secret-ballot voters are disproportionately
in the "authoritarian" quadrant, the opposite quadrant from limited coercion advocates.
Given that certain "Latinos" are already considered a very important secret-ballot swing vote, and will become ever more
important as they choose to become a larger percentage of the total number of secret-ballot voters, the current
volume of certain "Latino" "border crossings"
can't be good news in the short to medium term for fans of limited coercion...
Bloggers (and others) who complain about
Bush's big spending ways should note that this is a predictable side effect of the
Republicans' need to capture a healthy percentage of certain "Latino" secret-ballot votes
(among other factors).
This unique opportunity for independent scientific analysis of
secret-ballot voting system source code demonstrates
the fallacy of the closed-source argument for such a critical system. Our analysis shows that
this secret-ballot voting system is far below even the most minimal security standards applicable in other contexts.
We highlight several issues including unauthorized privilege escalation, incorrect use of cryptography,
vulnerabilities to network threats, and poor software development processes. For example, common secret-ballot voters,
without any insider privileges, can cast unlimited secret-ballot votes without being detected by any mechanisms
within the secret-ballot voting terminal. Furthermore, we show that even the most serious of our outsider attacks
could have been discovered without the source code. In the face of such attacks, the usual worries about
insider threats are not the only concerns; outsiders can do the damage. That said, we demonstrate that
the insider threat is also quite considerable. We conclude that, as taxpayers, we must carefully consider
the effects of electronic secret-ballot voting on
the Game called "U.S.A".
"Larry Lessig says that Charlie
Nesson's ideas always seem crazy until about a year later...
So Charlie walks into the office yesterday and says he has an idea that
is crazy even for him..(but once we hear it, we like the idea)
Charlie's idea is to run a candidate for
President of the United States
who is supported by humans who have access to and use the web. Essentially this human
would be a second superpower candidate for the key power role in the first superpower.
Charlie is suggesting John Perry Barlow as the candidate,
because John is excellent
at debating and discussing controversial issues, and the role of the candidate will
be to change minds--not simply to win secret-ballot votes."
~~~
"Charlie might also wish to consider me, too. The more, the merrier!" said Johnny Cheese in a recent impromtu press
conference in front of the
The Organic Grill.
You can either do things right out of your own volition, or you can be forced
to do things right by "external pressures," including "coercive external
control systems" commonly called "government."
Overheard in the Manhattan office of the Johnny Cheese Party...
"Daddy, I want you to call SpongeBob SquarePants'
publicist and
make a political alliance with SpongeBob!", demanded
4-year old Melissa of her father Johnny Cheese.
Adding, with a smile on her face and a twinkle in her
eyes, "How else are we giong to effectively get the
message out to kids that 'secret-ballot voting' is just plain old adult silly-ness?"
Much of the power bureaucrats seem to have over their victims is really illusory.
The power seems real because if you don't obey them, bureaucrats with guns may
eventually use physical force to compel you to obey -- or steal your property,
jail you, and/or shoot you.
But what if they don't notice some of your activities? What if you don't tell them
about some of your activities? What if you don't "snitch on yourself" by reporting
some of your activities to them? How much of what they don't see and don't know
about can
bureaucrats really control?
The Johnny Cheese Party hacks have created some banners for you to use on
your website - should you desire to brainwash others into "voting" for Johnny Cheese.
Just right click and save the graphic to your computer. Please do not 'hotlink' to our server. Thanks.
Yes, the banners currently available are all 468x60 in size. These might be too big for most bloggers'
tastes. The hacks will post some small blog-sized banners (in the range of 90x33) soon.
Enjoy the power of your political intuition. All the best with your propaganda efforts!
Johnny Cheese and The Johnny Cheese Party are just a figment of your imagination.
Sentient beings on the planet already know that they are free to not coerce others, and, as such,
they already know intuitively that a "mind construct", such as, for example, VOTE JOHNNY CHEESE, or
JOHNNY CHEESE FOR PRESIDENT,
is not needed to help them "learn" what they already know.
What this means is that is does not matter whether or not you "cast a secret ballot 'vote' (so-called)".
Why would it?! Everyone already knows the above facts!
But, if you do decide to "cast a secret ballot 'vote' (so-called)", then consider writing in
Johnny Cheese - the universal write-in candidate for every "election" on the planet.
"Which reminds me. When my staff turns this website into a full blown blog, we will link and track
and campaigne in every election on the planet. So get the word out, to those who "vote", that the alternative
is Johnny Cheese! Vote Johnny Cheese!" said a smiling and laughing Johnny Cheese.
Positioning himself as "the universal write-in candidate for all 'elections' (so-called) taking place on the planet",
Johnny Cheese says he's running for "president of the United States" (so-called).
"I officially announce my candidacy for president of the United States today - on
Tribute Day. I
intentionally planned to announce my candidacy on Tribute Day and I am happy to so do so," said a smiling and
joyous Johnny Cheese.
"My running mate is Lysander Spooner. We guarantee, guarantees
are better than promises, don't you think? ...that for as many US
Federal Reserve Note fiat currency units as you wish, that, if we win, we will not show up to work. Which means we
will not coerce you."
"How can I, Johnny Cheese, guarantee that - and back it up with no less than any amount of fiat currency
units of your choosing, you ask? Because I am just a figment
of your imagination... and Lysander gave up the ghost in May of 1887."
"What is less dangerous, 'voting' for someone who is just a figment of your imagination or 'voting' for some who
plays
the game
for real?"
And with that, Johnny Cheese ended his press conference with his 4-year old daughter throwing a bannana creme
pie in his face!
"If I am 'elected,' then I will not be reporting for duty."
Click here to read the
Johnny Cheese political-hack guarantee (not a promise but a guarantee)! Johnny Cheese is the
only "political candidate (hack)" in the history of
Earth Culture
(see also this article)
that we know of,
who, if elected, will not be reporting for duty.
If you would like to further empower yourself (you are already very, very powerful you know) and make for some
fun mischief and make "politics" actually fun, then "vote" Johnny Cheese, the universal write-in candidate -
for every secret-ballot election on the planet in which you "vote."
Because if Johnny Cheese wins, he will not show up to work. Which means that he will not coerce you.
Which means that you are free to do what ever you want except for coercing others; just like you are suppose to
be doing right now! You are FREE to not coerce others!
Or, consider not casting secret-ballot votes at all!
It is much easier that way. Not casting secret-ballot votes is the shortcut method
and is actually more powerful than writing-in Johnny Cheese.
What does an individual playing the role of politician FEAR the most?
You already know, deep down in your heart, what the answer is.
Yes, BEING IGNORED!
When you support Johnny Cheese, you support two end games: (1) No Coercion and (2)
Ignoring Politcians.
"I luv saying that I am a card-carrying member of The Johnny Cheese Party.
Well, it just leaves me with a good taste in my mouth." ~ Suzy Smith, Taxpayer and J.C. Party Hack
Jan Kees, Jan Kaas, Janke, Yangees, Yankees, Johnny Cheese
Johnny Cheese, the universal write-in candidate - for every secret-ballot election on the planet.
The Johnny Cheese Party Platform
Freedom from coercion. All humans are free to NOT coerce others.
Vices are not crimes. All those dwelling in the agents'* gulogs, who were sent their because
the agent ("judge" so-called) defined the rules of the "court" proceeding with the direct or indirect assertion
that vices are crimes,
shall be immediately set free.
Those freed are strongly urged
to not commit acts of revenge. The question to ask yourself is, "What Would Jesus Do?"
Crimes committed against persons and/or property. For all those dwelling in the
agents'* gulogs - who were sent their by the agents because they committed crimes against persons and/or
property: First attempts shall be
made, in an expeditious manner, to contact and turn custody of the prisoner over to the injured person(s) or injured
person's relative or the injured party's duly appointed agent. Those "taking custody" of said prisoner are strongly urged
to not commit acts of revenge. The question to ask yourself is, "What Would Jesus Do?"
If the injured party declines to take custody of said prisoner, or the injured party can not be otherwise located or
contacted, then the Johnny Cheese Party awaits for creative solutions
for these prisoners.
Money and credit. Money and credit are too important to be "policed" (regulated [sic]) by agents*.
When conducting your business, you are strongly encouraged to use any
medium of exchange (money and/or credit)
which works best for you and the other party to the transaction.
Learning a trade-craft. Learning a trade-craft (referred to by many agents as "Education" (so-called))
is too important to be "policed" (regulated [sic]) by agents*.
When learning a trade-craft, you are strongly encouraged to choose a teacher or mentor
who you feel most comfortable with. If you have children, then your are strongly encouraged to
stop sending them to Concentration Campuses For Mind Destruction.
Your health, dis-eases, aging process, and spirit. Your health, dis-eases, aging process, and spirit are
too important to be "policed" (regulated [sic]) by agents*.
When increasing the health of your body and spirit, you are strongly encouraged to seek out remedies and treatments
which are not toxic and which provide no side-effects.
Transitioning to a peaceful free-enterprise economy.
Message to workerbees: No worries; there will be
so much work being offered, you will be able to get into any carreer field of your choosing.
Message to
business and property owners who are 'heavily invested' in 'public' [sic] and 'private' [sic] markets created
and sustained by agent* "policing": No worries; As owners, you already possess great physical wealth (no matter
how obtained by you and/or you living and dead reletives) that it should be fairly easy for you and your offspring
to form new businesses and/or improve upon your exisitng business and/or seek out new customers for your product or
service.
Message to
business and property owners who are already operating in the free-enterprise economy (i.e. black market economy):
Keep doing what you are doing sisters and brothers!
Taxes are voluntary. As the agents, under Johnny Cheese, disband to form their private interests, if you
want to do business with them, then do business with them (exchange money with them). If you want garbage collection,
then pay directly for the service to the individuals providing the service. Johnny Cheese is not going to force you to
pay. Others are strongly urged not commit acts of extortion to collect money; that would not be nice.
Cultivating fruits, vegtables, grains, greens, and certain land and sea animals. Cultivating fruits, vegtables,
grains, greens, and certain land and sea animals are too important to be "policed" (regulated [sic]) by agents*.
You are strongly encouraged to seek out, grow, and eat food without pesticides and without genetic
modification.
Freedom of movement. Moving from landmass to landmass and over waterways is too important to be "policed" (regulated [sic]) by agents*.
You are strongly encouraged to travel where ever and when ever you like.
* Note: -As used here, 'agents' means 'agents for the taxpayers'.
"The Constitution has no inherent authority
or obligation. It has no authority or obligation at all, unless
as a contract between man and man. And it does not so much as even purport to be a contract between persons
now existing. It purports, at most, to be only a contract between persons living [two hundred eighteen] years ago. And it
can be supposed to have been a contract then only between persons who had already come to years of discretion,
so as to be competent to make reasonable and obligatory contracts. Furthermore, we know, historically, that
only a small portion even of the people then existing were consulted on the subject, or asked, or permitted
to express either their consent or dissent in any formal manner. Those persons, if any, who did give their
consent formally, are all dead now. Most of them have been dead [one hundred seventy, one hundred eighty, one
hundred ninety, or two hundred years]. And
the Constitution, so far as it was their contract, died with them. They had no natural power or right to make
it obligatory upon their children. It is not only plainly impossible, in the nature of things, that they
could bind their posterity, but they did not even attempt to bind them. That is to say, the instrument does
not purport to be an agreement between any body but 'the people' then existing; nor does it, either expressly
or impliedly, assert any right, power, or disposition, on their part, to bind anybody but themselves."
The face of Lysander Spooner.
(If you need a "running-mate" for your "secret-ballot vote").
The Inate Reasons Why Johnny Cheese Will "Win" Secret-ballot Elections Taking Place All Over The Planet.
The nature of secret ballet voting is inherently rigged in favor of Johnny Cheese!
The following are snips from the whitepaper
"Evolution consciousness and the new technologies: crisis [sic] in
communication for the twenty-first century" -- by Mike Aldridge
If changes in environment caused by natural means have in the past propelled our ancestors to adopt the upright,
bipedal posture, and concomitantly to expand their mental capacity through evolving the cerebral neocortex
in order to become the sophisticated, creative innovators and controllers we have become today, then it is
not impossible that the current rapid changes which we are creating in our environment can launch a new spurt
of evolutionary growth. This evolution is not necessarily the biological natural selection proposed by Darwin,
with some scientists claiming that humankind has found its ecological niche and will not progress any
further but rather it is an evolution of consciousness, for it is in this sphere that we are likely to
notice the most profound changes in the future.
The... arguments imply that evolution is not simply a Darwinian process of natural selection -- rather natural
selection is the physical response within a species to the higher-level co-ordinating function of the
meta-ecological systems in which that species exists. So, for example, insects which evolve their
appearance to mimic other insects as camouflage do so not by random processes of natural selection, but because
the development of this new shape is a response to the total information awareness system of the environment in which
the species exists. In this sense, the 'total information awarness system' is a form of mind, the 'higher level or
co-ordination' which acts to direct change.
Despite the inertia of the currently entrenched power structures [sic] of the postmodern world, Crary and Kwinter
contend there will always be counter-paradigmatic movements [sic] with the vitality to challenge and even overcome
the status quo. These forces have the capacity for 'cognitive and cultural transformation', in other words using
these mechanisms to transform human society as a whole.
The evolution of which I speak is one in which individual self-consciousness is linked to global human
self-consciousness [sic]. By transforming the individual's capacity for conceiving and constructing the world
in new ways we can, through mechanisms of advanced interconnectivity, transform planetary consciousness [sic]
into new ways of becoming. This process occurs primarily through the mechanism
of media, which is the mirror
in which we can view ourselves as a species (media here include the `cybermedia' of computer
communications).
One positive or encouraging fact to emerge from chaos theory in recent times is the notion that small changes to
a dynamic system can have large consequences (the so-called `butterfly effect'). If we wish to affect the
outcome of social and economic tendencies in the long term -- in other words if we wish our present
self-organising human system to transcend itself -- we must work ceaselessly towards this goal.
The principle which orders chaotic or dynamic systems is that of iteration, repeatedly feeding the outcome
of the social equation back into itself. This principle indicates how countercultural tendencies, for example
revolutionary movements [sic], can sweep to power despite the odds stacked in favour of the status quo.
The type of liminal communicative events cited above must be continually created and repeated for the
transcendence embodied in them to become translated into the everyday phenomenal world. The site of
struggle on our planet has moved into the realm of consciousness -- we must create ourselves anew
through actualising the potentials of mind if we want to be free.
The Johnny Cheese Party needs your help. If you intend to "cast secret-ballot votes" for Johnny Cheese,
or, if you intend not to "cast secret-ballot votes"
at all, and, if you wish this decision to be known, then please consider butting a
VOTE JOHNNY CHEESE! banner on your website or blog and then link back to this
site.
We thank you greatly for your support!
And please, we do not need a "Jeannie Cheese" or a "Jane Cheese". "Secret-ballot Voting," within the contextual universe
of
the game, is
one of the last vestiges of patriarcy.
Let the last symbol of patriarcy be Johnny Cheese, please!
The Johnny Cheese Party is indebted to the following individuals:
Mumia Abu-Jamal,
Philip Berrigan,
Helen Caldicott,
William Cooper,
Mahatma Gandhi,
Amy Goodman,
Julian Janes,
Jesus,
Martin Luther King,
'Grampa' Al Lewis,
Agela Davis,
Frederick Mann,
Henry Miller,
Gary Null,
Jon Rappoport,
Arundhati Roy,
Irwin Schiff,
Lysander Spooner,
Michael Skye,
Edwin Vieira,
Michael Wolff,
Malcom X,
Real University - Darryl Hell & Deftly-D,
(and many more)DISCLAIMER: This website does not challenge or threaten the authority of any legitimate government. The information
on this website is provided in accordance with the right to free speech. It does not constitute accounting, tax,
or legal advice. Anyone seeking such advice should consult a competent professional. READERS AND USERS OF THIS WEBSITE
ARE PARTICULARLY URGED TO OBEY ALL LAWS IN THE UNIVERSE!
